1Nomun hospital
2Health Sciences University of Mongolia
The volume-outcome relationship has been widely discussed over past decades. Although previous studies that examined the volume-outcome relationship show that the majority of these works support the reverse relationship of volume and outcome on various procedures, other studies reported inconsistent results and arguments if volume is robust enough to predict outcome. Therefore, extending volume outcome association to measuring efficiency as well as process quality of care, and linking the performance with outcome have been important issues not to health purchasers, but also providers and consumers when pursuing cost containment and quality improvement in health care industry. The purpose of this study is to review studies on the relationship between volume and outcome, and to identify possible measurements and methods. The large quantity of literature reported surgical volume-outcome relationship, but several limitations of those studies also have criticized and should be explored and re-verified. First, surgical volume was argued as a proxy of experience of surgeon and higher volume cannot naturally guarantee better outcome. Second, since the health care purchasers have drawn attention to the concept of pursuing value in health care, the efficiency of providers and the quality of care delivered should be measured instead of cost or volume alone. In addition, some specific possible outcome indicators should be considered in studies of the relationship between surgeons volume and outcome in future.
2. Henebiens, M., van den Broek, T.A. A., Vahl, A. C., & Koelemay, M. J. W. Relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A systematic review. EJVES 2007;33(3):285-292
3. Holt, P. J. E., Poloniecki, J. D., Loftus, I. M., &Thompson, M. M. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome following carotid endarterectomy. EJVES 2007; 33(6):645-651.
4. Halm, E A., Lee, C., &Chassin, M.R. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002; 137(6):511-520.
5. Hebert-Croteau, B., Roberge, D., & Brission, J. Providers volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2007; 105(2):117-132
6. Hillner, B. E., Smith, T. J., & Desch, C. E. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: Importance in quality of cancer care. JCO 2000; 18(11):2327-2340.
7. Hodgson, D. C., Fuchs, C. S., & Ayanian, J. Z. Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer. JNCI 2001; 93(7):501-515.
8. Weiw, J., Koch, M., Friess, H., & Buchler, M. W. Impact of volume and specialization for cancer surgery. Digestive Surgery. 2004; 21(4):253-261.
9. Doue, M., & Taylor, I. Good practice and quality assurance in surgical oncology. Lancet Oncology. 2003; 4(10):626-630.
10. Hogan, A. M., & Winter, D. C. Does practice make perfect? Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2008; 15(5):1267-1270.
11. Joseph, Bellal, Morton, John M., Hernandez-Boussard, Tina, Rubinfeld, Ilan, Faraj, Chadi, & Velanovich, Vic. Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and Mortality in Pancreatic Resection. JACS 2009; 208(4):520-527.
12. Kraus, T. W., Buchler, M. W., & Herfarth, C. Relationships between volume, efficiency, and quality in surgery-A delicate balance from managerial perspectives. 2005; 29(10):1234-1240.
13. Wennberg, J. E., Fisher, E. S., Baker, L., Sharp, S. M., & Bronner, K. K. Evaluating the efficiency of California providers in caring for patients with chronic illnesses. Health Affairs. 2006; 25(1):W5526-W5543.
14. Luft, H. S., Bunker, J. P., & Enthoven, A. C. Should Operations be Regionalized –Empirical Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality. NEJM 1979; 301(25):1364-1369.
15. Wouters, Mwjm, Krijnen, P., Le Cessie, S., Gooikier, G. A., Guicherrit, O. R., Marinelli, Awks, et al. Volume-or Outcome based Referral to Improve Quality of Care for Esophageal Cancer Surgery in The Netherlands. JSO 2009; 99(8):481-487.