Монголын Анагаахын Сэтгүүлүүдийн Холбоо (МАСХ)
Mongolian Journal of Health Sciences, 2006, 2(3)
Comparison of polydioxanone and silicone plastic in the prevention of adhesive otitis media
( Судалгааны өгүүлэл )

Ulziibayar A1, Erdenechuluun B2

1State Maternal and Child Health Research Center of Mongolia

2School of Medicine, Health Sciences University of Mongolia

 
Абстракт

The purpose of this study was to compare polydioxanone sheets with silicone plastic sheets in the middle ear to find out inexpensive ideal material to prevent readhesion of tympanic membrane to the promontory, to stay for long enough time until middle ear mucosal line regenerated and to absorb itself after regenerating of middle ear mucosa. Polydioxanone sheets were placed in 24 middle ears and silastic sheets were placed in 12 middle ears during ear surgery to prevent readhesion of tympanic membrane. The result of this study demonstrate that polydioxanone sheets are as effective and as well tolerated as silicone plastic sheets in the middle ear.

Ном зүй

1. Chu CC, Kizil Z, 1989. Quantataivae evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 168:233-238
2. De Werra C, Rendano F, D\'Aremtno F, Somma P, Forestieri P, 2003. Comparison of five synthetic absorbable suture materials in intestinal
anastomosis: experimental study in rats. ChirHal. 55/2/: 227-33
3. Douglas A Liening. 1995. Comparison of polydioxanone and silicone plastic in the prevention of adhesive otitis media in the gerbil. Otolaryngology Head
Neck Surgery; 112:303-307
4. Duffy DM. 1990. Silicone: a critical review. Adv Dermatol; 5:93-110
5. Fieheller, Wilson D. 2005. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the breaking strength and stiffness of polydioxanone /sizes 2.7/ and polyglactin 910
/sizes 3.6/ in the equinelinea alba. Vet Surg; 34/1/: 18-23
6. Fleiberk L. 2001. Suturing the Achiles tendon with absorbable PDS material. Rozhl Chir; 80:487-489
7. Hilgert RE, Dorner A, Wittkugel.O 1999. Comparison of polydioxanone /PDS/ and polypropylene /prolene/ for shouldice repair of primary inquinal hernias:
a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Surg. 165/4A333-8
8. Hoyt, RFClevenger, RR,McGehee, JA.Microsurgical. 2001. Instrumentation and suture material. Lab.Anim; 30:38-45
9. Marianowski L, Barcz E. 2004. Biological tissue response to sutures. Ginekol. Pol; 75 pp:570-577.
10. Nary Filho H, Matsumoto MA, Batista AC. 2002. Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglacin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene
suture materials in rats. Bra: Dent J; 13:86-91
11. Ng M, Linthicum FH Jr. 1992. Long term effects of Silastic sheeting in the middle ear. Laryngoscope;l02:1097-1102
12. Paparella MJung TT. 1981. Experience with tympanoplasty for atelectatic ears. Laryngoscope; 91:1972
13. Stewart D.W, Buffington PJ,Wacksman J. 1990. Suture material in bladder surgery: a comparison of polydioxanone, polyglactin and chromic catgut. J Urol.;
143:1261 -1263
14. Wehrs RE. 1979. Silicone sheeting in tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope; 89:497-9
15. Yaltiric M,Dedeoglu K,Bilgic B, et.al. 2003. Comparision of four different suture materials in soft tissue in rats. Oral Dis. 9:284-286
 


Зохиогчийн оруулсан түлхүүр үгс


Нийтлэлийн нээгдсэн тоо: 254
Судлаачдын бусад өгүүлэл
Зохиогчийн эрх хуулиар хамгаалагдсан. Дэлхийн Эрүүл Мэндийн Байгууллага, ©  2012.
Вебийг бүтээсэн Слайд ХХК